Soft focus image of android phone with icons for Parler and Twitter to illustrate dispute over the banning of President Trump account.
David Marty Writer
David Marty Writer
December 3, 2024 ·  4 min read

Australian Senate Approves Social Media Ban for Under-16s

Australian Senate Passes Social Media Ban for Children Under 16

Facade and national flag on tall flagpole over modern acting australian parlament in Canberra capital city with bright illumination at sunset against blue sky.

Australia has introduced a significant law banning social media access for children under 16. The legislation addresses concerns about cyberbullying, harmful content, and mental health risks, and carries penalties of up to A$50 million for non-compliant tech companies.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese calls it a necessary measure to ensure children’s safety and to provide parents peace of mind.

Legislative Milestones

A curious woman follows a teenage girl child, trying to read her text.

The bill secured approval in the Senate with a 34–19 vote and now returns to the House of Representatives for final consideration of amendments. Given the government’s majority in the lower house, its passage is virtually assured.

Once enacted, the law will enter a one-year preparation phase, during which enforcement mechanisms and age-verification technologies will be developed and tested. 

Key Features of the Ban

Young Asian preteen teenager boy hugging his knee in his bedroom with smartphone.

The legislation applies universally to all children under the age of 16, without any exemptions for existing users or those with parental consent. 

It specifically targets social media platforms that require user accounts for access, including major names such as X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

However, the law exempts online gaming platforms, messaging apps, and open-access sites like YouTube that do not require account creation. 

Support for the Legislation

Teenage daughter looking messages in a smartphone and ignoring her mother.

Parents support the ban, citing relief from concerns over cyberbullying, screen addiction, and exposure to harmful content. Polls also show strong backing among Australian caregivers, reflecting broad societal concern.

Prime Minister Albanese argues the ban ensures children experience offline interactions free from unnecessary digital pressures. Advocates believe the law will provide a safer and healthier online environment for children.

However, the law has also sparked debate about enforcement, privacy concerns, and potential social implications.

Criticism of the Ban

A teenage girl suffering from insomnia using a mobile phone for social media lies under a blanket on her bed in her bedroom.

Privacy advocates are concerned about the risks of using facial recognition and ID verification, fearing misuse of sensitive information. 

Critics argue the ban may be ineffective, as children can bypass it with tools like VPNs. There are also worries it could isolate young people from their support networks. 

Global Context

Child playing games in phone at home lying on couch.

France introduced a similar ban for those under 15, but it was bypassed using VPNs.

South Korea’s gaming “shutdown law” faced criticism and was eventually repealed. A similar law in Utah, USA, was struck down as unconstitutional. 

Australia’s approach is being closely observed by global leaders, including those from Norway and the UK, as a potential model for future regulations.

Concerns from Experts

Teenage girl using a smartphone on a bed, social media and addiction concept.

More than 100 academics have criticized the ban for oversimplifying the complex effects of social media on youth. Underserved communities often find support and community online, raising concerns about potential unintended side. 

Experts advocate for including young people in policymaking to better address their needs and perspectives. They stress focusing on improving digital literacy and holding social media platforms accountable for safer online environments.

Industry Reaction

Assorted popular social media apps, including Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok, WeChat, Telegram, Messenger, and Snapchat, are seen on an iPhone.

Google, Snap, Meta, and TikTok criticize the law for its lack of detail and potential overreach.

TikTok warns the law’s definitions could apply to a broad range of online services. X questions the compatibility of the law with international human rights treaties.

Industry groups argue the ban could push youth toward unregulated, unsafe online spaces, undermining the law’s intent.

Implementation Challenges

Data protection and cybersecurity concept

The eSafety Commissioner is facing significant challenges in enforcing the ban across evolving digital platforms. Age-verification technologies remain unproven, with privacy risks associated with storing sensitive data. 

Determining “low-risk” platforms and ensuring consistent application of exemptions are ongoing hurdles. Rapid technological advancements are potentially outpacing the law, creating enforcement challenges and legal ambiguities.

Potential Outcomes

A teenager using smartphone alone reading bad comments, text negative emoticons pop up above the screen.

The law aims to reduce cyberbullying, screen addiction, and mental health issues among children.

Success depends on its strict enforcement, effective age-verification systems, and continued dialogue with stakeholders.

Policymakers must monitor outcomes and adapt strategies to address emerging challenges and unintended impacts.

Looking Ahead

X social media icon logo displayed on a smartphone

The Australian government plans to introduce “digital duty of care” laws to hold tech companies accountable for user safety.

The proposed laws would require companies to take action to protect users, including:

  • Implementing robust systems to detect and remove harmful content  
  • Taking steps to prevent the spread of misinformation and disinformation  
  • Protecting children from online exploitation and abuse  
  • Promoting digital literacy and online safety education

The Impact of Australia’s Social Media Ban

TikTok banned.

The Australian Senate’s approval of the social media ban highlights the increasing global focus on mitigating online risks for young people. The legislation raises important issues regarding enforcement, privacy, and the balance between safety and freedom. 

While the goal is to create safer online spaces, its effectiveness will depend on proper implementation and adaptation to technological advancements. Australia’s decision may set a precedent for other countries tackling the intersection of youth protection and digital progress.

In Ireland, Little Christmas Is a Day for Women to Celebrate at the Nearest Pub

Young Irish girl smiling happy standing at the city.

The end of the holiday season often brings a mix of relief and nostalgia, but in Ireland, January 6 holds something extra special. Known as Nollaig na mBan, or “Women’s Christmas,” this day provides women with a well-earned break and an opportunity to celebrate the conclusion of the festive rush.

Deeply rooted in tradition, it remains a delightful custom, especially cherished in rural communities.

Influencers Drown After Refusing to Wear Life Jackets

Bright marine life vest signal jackets close up

Two influencers tragically drowned off the coast of Brazil after reportedly refusing to wear life jackets at a yacht party.

Aline Tamara Moreira de Amorim, 37, and Beatriz Tavares da Silva Faria, 27, lost their lives when a massive wave struck their overcrowded yacht and sank near the area known as “Devil’s Throat.” 

Read More: Luxury hotel banned all social media influencers